عنوان مقاله
درصد تائید نشده مدیریت دانش
فهرست مطالب
کودک جدید در عرصه
پیشایندهای مدیریت دانش در اقتصاد و جامعه شناسی
تاریخچه فراموش شده مدیریت دانش
فراموشی و بی توجهی در مدیریت دانش
پیامدهای فراموشی و بی توجهی در مدیریت دانش
بخشی از مقاله
فراموشی و بی توجهی در مدیریت دانش
جامعه شناس معروف Robert Merton پدیده فراموشی در علم را مطالعه کرد، که هنر قبل به نفع نگرانیهای سیاسی فعلی برای مشروعیت فراموش شده و ایده ها به حدی مشهور می شوند که خواستگاههای آنها به طور تحت اللفظی با جذب محو می شود. در سرتاسر دهه 1990 روشن بود که مدیریت دانش درفاز بشارتی قرار داشت، شرایط وسعت داده شده، نه با وساطت محرک های تجاری ورای آن. و این مسئله صحت دارد که عاملی جدید در مورد ظهور شبکه جهانی وب و پیامدهایش برای دسترسی و کاربرد اطلاعات وجود داشت.
کلمات کلیدی:
The unacknowledged parentage of knowledge management Patrick Lambe Abstract Purpose – This paper aims to argue that the current malaise and fragmentation within knowledge management are at least partially caused by a lack of awareness of its own historical roots. Design/methodology/approach – A comprehensive literature review shows that very explicit knowledge management concepts and practices were in circulation 50 years ago and that current knowledge management literature has very little historical depth. Findings – The current canonical knowledge management literature almost universally ignores significant antecedents to knowledge management thinking and practice dating back to the 1960s. Practical implications – There are three practical implications: for knowledge management education to recover its historical antecedents; for KM theorists and practitioners to connect KM theory and practice to historically-related work in economics, sociology and information management, from which it is currently isolated; through an understanding of its roots to help knowledge management theorists build a meaningful and coherent agenda for the discipline. Originality/value – This is the most extensive exploration to date of the historical origins of knowledge management, with significant implications for recovering a productive agenda for the discipline. Keywords Information management, Knowledge organizations, Intellectual capital, Knowledge management Paper type Literature review C harles Dickens opened the second chapter of his 1865 novel Our Mutual Friend with a description of the Veneering family: Mr and Mrs Veneering were bran-new people in a bran-new house in a bran-new quarter of London. Everything about the Veneerings was spick and span new. All their furniture was new, all their friends were new, all their servants were new, their plate was new, their carriage was new, their harness was new, their horses were new, their pictures were new, they themselves were new, they were as newly married as was lawfully compatible with their having a bran-new baby, and if they had set up a great-grandfather, he would have come home in matting from the Pantechnicon, without a scratch upon him, French polished to the crown of his head. (Dickens, 1865). In many ways, this characterization of improbable newness could be applied to knowledge management in the mid-1990s. The new kid on the block It is generally accepted that knowledge management emerged as a discipline in the early 1990s, fuelled by a confluence of computing availability, propagation through consulting firms, and conference promotion – three Cs: computing, consultants, and conferences. There was a fourth C as well: commerce. Our three driving forces also provided a strong commercial push to market knowledge management as a new organizational tool.
